|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
18/03/2021 |
Actualizado : |
22/03/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
FERNANDEZ, E.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; FERRARO, B.; LANFRANCO, B. |
Afiliación : |
ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN MANUEL SOARES DE LIMA LAPETINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO FERRARO ALBERTONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO ANTONIO LANFRANCO CRESPO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Modellng alternative technology adoption transformation scenarios to achieve production and economic performance goals in the uruguayan beef cattle sector. [abstract + poster] |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics, 3., ECONAGRO, 2019, Alanya, Turkey. Proceedings book. p.53-54. |
ISBN : |
978-605-81058-1-2 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Editado por: Harun Uçak (Ed.). Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University. 3rd International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics. ECONAGRO. Proceeding Book.
25 -26th April 2019 Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Turkey. |
Contenido : |
Abtract.
The Agricultural Transformation Pathways (ATP) for Uruguay and two other selected study cases issued in 2016 in the frame of the UN´s Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) projectmade relevant advances in setting the desired and feasible goals and development objectives for 2030 (Schwoob et al., 2016). Beef is one of the main agri-food chains included in Uruguay´s first studies given is the country´s main export and production is the largest in terms of land used (12,6
million ha) and farms involved (44780).
Understanding the relationship among the multiple factors driving farmers´ decision making process is crucial for policymakers and experts selecting the best pathway to overcome roadblocks and reach goals. This paper addresses the relationship between farm business orientation, farm size, technological level, production performance and economic return in the beef cattle production sector. The objective is to understand the main constraints to the adoption of technology and the main factors to consider in the design of future assistance programs. |
Palabras claves : |
Livestock Production Modeling; Meat; SDSN; Sustainable Intensification; Technology Adoption; UNIDAD ECONOMIA APLICADA - INIA. |
Asunto categoría : |
E10 Economía y políticas agrícolas |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15359/1/Fernandez-Soares-de-Lima-Ferraro-Lanfranco.-ECONAGRO-2019-Proceedings.pdf
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15373/1/Poster-Ravello-236.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02211nam a2200241 a 4500 001 1061840 005 2021-03-22 008 2019 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 020 $a978-605-81058-1-2 100 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E. 245 $aModellng alternative technology adoption transformation scenarios to achieve production and economic performance goals in the uruguayan beef cattle sector. [abstract + poster]$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics, 3., ECONAGRO, 2019, Alanya, Turkey. Proceedings book. p.53-54.$c2019 500 $aEditado por: Harun Uçak (Ed.). Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University. 3rd International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics. ECONAGRO. Proceeding Book. 25 -26th April 2019 Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Turkey. 520 $aAbtract. The Agricultural Transformation Pathways (ATP) for Uruguay and two other selected study cases issued in 2016 in the frame of the UN´s Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) projectmade relevant advances in setting the desired and feasible goals and development objectives for 2030 (Schwoob et al., 2016). Beef is one of the main agri-food chains included in Uruguay´s first studies given is the country´s main export and production is the largest in terms of land used (12,6 million ha) and farms involved (44780). Understanding the relationship among the multiple factors driving farmers´ decision making process is crucial for policymakers and experts selecting the best pathway to overcome roadblocks and reach goals. This paper addresses the relationship between farm business orientation, farm size, technological level, production performance and economic return in the beef cattle production sector. The objective is to understand the main constraints to the adoption of technology and the main factors to consider in the design of future assistance programs. 653 $aLivestock Production Modeling 653 $aMeat 653 $aSDSN 653 $aSustainable Intensification 653 $aTechnology Adoption 653 $aUNIDAD ECONOMIA APLICADA - INIA 700 1 $aSOARES DE LIMA, J.M. 700 1 $aFERRARO, B. 700 1 $aLANFRANCO, B.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
07/05/2021 |
Actualizado : |
06/09/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Nacional - -- |
Autor : |
FERNÁNDEZ, G.; SCAPARONI, F.; SISQUELLA, M.; PINTOS, P.; LUQUE, E.; MOLTINI, A.; LADO, J. |
Afiliación : |
GERÓNIMO FERNÁNDEZ VELAZCO, Asociación Civil Unión de Productores y Exportadores de Fruta del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.; FEDERICO SCAPARONI, Ejercicio libre de la profesión, Salto, Uruguay.; MARIA SISQUELLA, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Catalunya, España.; PEDRO MAXIMILIANO PINTOS RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MAYZA ELEANA LUQUE NUÑEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANA INÉS MOLTINI PALADINO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOANNA LADO LINDNER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Effects of different comercial coatings on postharvest citrus fruit quality for export. [Efecto de distintos recubrimientos comerciales en la calidad poscosecha de frutos cítricos para exportación.]. [Efeito de diferentes revestimentos comerciais na quali-dade pós-colheita de frutas cítricas para exportaçao.]. |
Complemento del título : |
Food Technology. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, Apr 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, e337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.337 |
ISSN : |
e-ISSN: 2730-5066 |
DOI : |
10.31285/AGRO.25.337 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 09 Mar 2020; Accepted 04 Nov 2020; Published 10 Feb 2021.
Editor: Gustavo González-Neves (Universidad de Ja República, Montevideo, Uruguay).
Correspondence: Joana Lado - Email: jado@inia.org.uy |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - The use of fruit coatings aims to avoid dehydration, minimize the occurrence of spots in the peel and weight loss as well as extend the postharvest life maintaining fruit appearance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fruit coatings in fruit quality, weight loss and acetaldehyde and ethanol production in differ-ent mandarin and orange varieties, during postharvest storage. With that aim, fruits of different varieties, with or without degreening and with postharvest fungicide treatment, were treated in experimental conditions with the commercial coatings Brillaqua UE-Mercosur and UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE and Sunseal, and Concentrol AC36, repeating the evaluation of the more promising treatments in commercial conditions together with Brillaqua UEF6-Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. In both experiments, fruit was stored for 6 weeks at 1±0.5 ºC plus 7 days at room temperature simulating shelf life. External and internal quality were evaluated at different moments during storage. None of the treatments affected fruit firmness, external or internal quality negatively compared with the commercial control BRIUE. The most promising treatments for their application in citrus post-harvest and storage at 1 ºC were Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, showing an acceptable brightness level, good appearance and superior quality. Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE were not discarded as alternatives since they presented acceptable brightness, appearance and acetaldehyde and etha-nol levels after storage.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
RESUMEN - El uso de recubrimientos tiene como objetivo evitar la deshidratación, minimizar la aparición de manchas en la piel y la pérdida de peso, además de prolongar la vida poscosecha y mantener la apariencia de los frutos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el efecto de diferentes recubrimientos en la calidad, la pérdida de peso y la producción de acetaldehído y etanol en distintas variedades de mandarina y naranja, durante el almacena-miento poscosecha. Para ello, frutos de distintas variedades, con o sin desverdizado, y con tratamiento fungicida poscosecha, fueron tratados con los recubrimientos comerciales Brillaqua UE-Mercosur y UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE y Sunseal, y Concentrol AC36, en condiciones experimentales, repitiéndose la evaluación de los más pro-misorios en condiciones comerciales junto con Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. En ambos ensayos la fruta se almacenó durante 6 semanas a 1±0,5 °C más 7 días a temperatura ambiente, simulando la vida comercial. Se evaluó la calidad visual e interna de los frutos en diferentes momentos del almacenamiento. Ningún tratamiento afectó negativamente la firmeza, la calidad externa o interna de la fruta en comparación con el control comercial BRIUE. Los recubrimientos más promisorios para su aplicación en pos-cosecha de frutos cítricos y posterior almacenamiento a 1 °C fueron Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, presentando un nivel de brillo, aspecto visual general y calidad superiores. No se descar-tan los recubrimientos Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE,con aceptables niveles de brillo luego de la conserva-ción, aspecto visual general, así como niveles de acetaldehído y etanol. MenosABSTRACT - The use of fruit coatings aims to avoid dehydration, minimize the occurrence of spots in the peel and weight loss as well as extend the postharvest life maintaining fruit appearance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fruit coatings in fruit quality, weight loss and acetaldehyde and ethanol production in differ-ent mandarin and orange varieties, during postharvest storage. With that aim, fruits of different varieties, with or without degreening and with postharvest fungicide treatment, were treated in experimental conditions with the commercial coatings Brillaqua UE-Mercosur and UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE and Sunseal, and Concentrol AC36, repeating the evaluation of the more promising treatments in commercial conditions together with Brillaqua UEF6-Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. In both experiments, fruit was stored for 6 weeks at 1±0.5 ºC plus 7 days at room temperature simulating shelf life. External and internal quality were evaluated at different moments during storage. None of the treatments affected fruit firmness, external or internal quality negatively compared with the commercial control BRIUE. The most promising treatments for their application in citrus post-harvest and storage at 1 ºC were Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, showing an acceptable brightness level, good appearance and superior quality. Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE were not discarded as alternatives since the... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Armazenamento; Citros; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; Pós-colheita; Postharvest; Storage; Wax. |
Thesagro : |
ALMACENAMIENTO; CERA; CITRUS; POSCOSECHA. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16743/1/Agrociencia-UY-2021-25-N1-337.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04842naa a2200361 a 4500 001 1062031 005 2022-09-06 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $ae-ISSN: 2730-5066 024 7 $a10.31285/AGRO.25.337$2DOI 100 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, G. 245 $aEffects of different comercial coatings on postharvest citrus fruit quality for export. [Efecto de distintos recubrimientos comerciales en la calidad poscosecha de frutos cítricos para exportación.]. [Efeito de diferentes revestimentos comerciais na quali-dade pós-colheita de frutas cítricas para exportaçao.].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received 09 Mar 2020; Accepted 04 Nov 2020; Published 10 Feb 2021. Editor: Gustavo González-Neves (Universidad de Ja República, Montevideo, Uruguay). Correspondence: Joana Lado - Email: jado@inia.org.uy 520 $aABSTRACT - The use of fruit coatings aims to avoid dehydration, minimize the occurrence of spots in the peel and weight loss as well as extend the postharvest life maintaining fruit appearance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fruit coatings in fruit quality, weight loss and acetaldehyde and ethanol production in differ-ent mandarin and orange varieties, during postharvest storage. With that aim, fruits of different varieties, with or without degreening and with postharvest fungicide treatment, were treated in experimental conditions with the commercial coatings Brillaqua UE-Mercosur and UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE and Sunseal, and Concentrol AC36, repeating the evaluation of the more promising treatments in commercial conditions together with Brillaqua UEF6-Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. In both experiments, fruit was stored for 6 weeks at 1±0.5 ºC plus 7 days at room temperature simulating shelf life. External and internal quality were evaluated at different moments during storage. None of the treatments affected fruit firmness, external or internal quality negatively compared with the commercial control BRIUE. The most promising treatments for their application in citrus post-harvest and storage at 1 ºC were Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, showing an acceptable brightness level, good appearance and superior quality. Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE were not discarded as alternatives since they presented acceptable brightness, appearance and acetaldehyde and etha-nol levels after storage. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMEN - El uso de recubrimientos tiene como objetivo evitar la deshidratación, minimizar la aparición de manchas en la piel y la pérdida de peso, además de prolongar la vida poscosecha y mantener la apariencia de los frutos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el efecto de diferentes recubrimientos en la calidad, la pérdida de peso y la producción de acetaldehído y etanol en distintas variedades de mandarina y naranja, durante el almacena-miento poscosecha. Para ello, frutos de distintas variedades, con o sin desverdizado, y con tratamiento fungicida poscosecha, fueron tratados con los recubrimientos comerciales Brillaqua UE-Mercosur y UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE y Sunseal, y Concentrol AC36, en condiciones experimentales, repitiéndose la evaluación de los más pro-misorios en condiciones comerciales junto con Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. En ambos ensayos la fruta se almacenó durante 6 semanas a 1±0,5 °C más 7 días a temperatura ambiente, simulando la vida comercial. Se evaluó la calidad visual e interna de los frutos en diferentes momentos del almacenamiento. Ningún tratamiento afectó negativamente la firmeza, la calidad externa o interna de la fruta en comparación con el control comercial BRIUE. Los recubrimientos más promisorios para su aplicación en pos-cosecha de frutos cítricos y posterior almacenamiento a 1 °C fueron Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, presentando un nivel de brillo, aspecto visual general y calidad superiores. No se descar-tan los recubrimientos Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE,con aceptables niveles de brillo luego de la conserva-ción, aspecto visual general, así como niveles de acetaldehído y etanol. 650 $aALMACENAMIENTO 650 $aCERA 650 $aCITRUS 650 $aPOSCOSECHA 653 $aArmazenamento 653 $aCitros 653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS 653 $aPós-colheita 653 $aPostharvest 653 $aStorage 653 $aWax 700 1 $aSCAPARONI, F. 700 1 $aSISQUELLA, M. 700 1 $aPINTOS, P. 700 1 $aLUQUE, E. 700 1 $aMOLTINI, A. 700 1 $aLADO, J. 773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay, Apr 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, e337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.337
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|